<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anita Dunn&#8217;s Favorite Philosopher Mao Tse-Tung</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prevarication.net/2009/10/anita-dunns-favorite-philosopher-mao-tse-tung/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prevarication.net/2009/10/anita-dunns-favorite-philosopher-mao-tse-tung/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the exposure and preservation of prevarication in public life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:58:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Trenn</title>
		<link>http://prevarication.net/2009/10/anita-dunns-favorite-philosopher-mao-tse-tung/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Trenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prevarication.net/?p=669#comment-428</guid>
		<description>What amazes me about speeches like this is that while I&#039;m convinced that she was speaking tongue-in-cheek, it&#039;s that it doesn&#039;t create controversy.  It&#039;s OK to say things like this tongue-in-cheek, whereas it&#039;s not OK to do so with Hitler.  Both are beyond the pale.  Dunn should have used someone else to make her point.  But she, like many, don&#039;t see totalitarian communists as necessarily being all that bad.

Granted, we fought against Hitler in a World War.  But it seems Mao has turned into first and foremost a important historical figure of the 20th Century and nothing more.  The millions of deaths are considered to be an afterthought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What amazes me about speeches like this is that while I&#8217;m convinced that she was speaking tongue-in-cheek, it&#8217;s that it doesn&#8217;t create controversy.  It&#8217;s OK to say things like this tongue-in-cheek, whereas it&#8217;s not OK to do so with Hitler.  Both are beyond the pale.  Dunn should have used someone else to make her point.  But she, like many, don&#8217;t see totalitarian communists as necessarily being all that bad.</p>
<p>Granted, we fought against Hitler in a World War.  But it seems Mao has turned into first and foremost a important historical figure of the 20th Century and nothing more.  The millions of deaths are considered to be an afterthought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
