Comments on: Pelosi Creates New Class of Criminals http://prevarication.net/2009/11/pelosi-creates-new-class-of-criminals/ Dedicated to the exposure and preservation of prevarication in public life. Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:45:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: The Reality Check » Blog Archive » Oath of Office, TARP, and Stolen Piggy Banks http://prevarication.net/2009/11/pelosi-creates-new-class-of-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-710 The Reality Check » Blog Archive » Oath of Office, TARP, and Stolen Piggy Banks Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:37:59 +0000 http://prevarication.net/?p=1403#comment-710 [...] We here at the NIP genuinely have been wondering if the oath of office has changed, because of the cavalier way this oath has been treated by our elected representatives. You may remember Nancy Pelosi’s response when asked about the constitutionality of forcing individuals to buy health insurance. Her condescending reply: “Are you serious? Are you serious?” [...] [...] We here at the NIP genuinely have been wondering if the oath of office has changed, because of the cavalier way this oath has been treated by our elected representatives. You may remember Nancy Pelosi’s response when asked about the constitutionality of forcing individuals to buy health insurance. Her condescending reply: “Are you serious? Are you serious?” [...]

]]> By: National Institute of Prevarication » Oath of Office, TARP, and Stolen Piggy Banks http://prevarication.net/2009/11/pelosi-creates-new-class-of-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-709 National Institute of Prevarication » Oath of Office, TARP, and Stolen Piggy Banks Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:39:57 +0000 http://prevarication.net/?p=1403#comment-709 [...] We here at the NIP genuinely have been wondering if the oath of office has changed, because of the cavalier way this oath has been treated by our elected representatives. You may remember Nancy Pelosi’s response when asked about the constitutionality of forcing individuals to buy health insurance. Her condescending reply: “Are you serious? Are you serious?” [...] [...] We here at the NIP genuinely have been wondering if the oath of office has changed, because of the cavalier way this oath has been treated by our elected representatives. You may remember Nancy Pelosi’s response when asked about the constitutionality of forcing individuals to buy health insurance. Her condescending reply: “Are you serious? Are you serious?” [...]

]]> By: Karl Munchausen http://prevarication.net/2009/11/pelosi-creates-new-class-of-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-185 Karl Munchausen Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:59:11 +0000 http://prevarication.net/?p=1403#comment-185 Obama stated during during an interview October 9, 2009 on ABC news, "There is nothing wrong with a penalty. Penalties are appropriate for people who try to free ride the system and force others to pay for their health insurance." By "people" he must mean taxpayers. The 30% of Americans who are not taxpayers but are on the dole (i.e. Obama voters) are surely exempted. Obama stated during during an interview October 9, 2009 on ABC news, “There is nothing wrong with a penalty. Penalties are appropriate for people who try to free ride the system and force others to pay for their health insurance.” By “people” he must mean taxpayers. The 30% of Americans who are not taxpayers but are on the dole (i.e. Obama voters) are surely exempted.

]]> By: Sam S http://prevarication.net/2009/11/pelosi-creates-new-class-of-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-144 Sam S Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:04:39 +0000 http://prevarication.net/?p=1403#comment-144 I did not believe it until I saw it... Sure enough, page 297 has it there. "‘‘SEC. 59B. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE." I didn't believe it. I did not believe it until I saw it… Sure enough, page 297 has it there. “‘‘SEC. 59B. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.”

I didn’t believe it.

]]> By: Karl Munchausen http://prevarication.net/2009/11/pelosi-creates-new-class-of-criminals/comment-page-1/#comment-143 Karl Munchausen Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:02:51 +0000 http://prevarication.net/?p=1403#comment-143 House Dems exerted their absolute control over Americans with the phrase, "Acceptable Coverage." They will decide what is acceptable, and they are free to change their definition at any time to suit any purpose. House Dems exerted their absolute control over Americans with the phrase, “Acceptable Coverage.” They will decide what is acceptable, and they are free to change their definition at any time to suit any purpose.

]]>