One thing interesting about the global warming debate is the direction in which its proponents want to push our governments. Never mind the science is bad. No matter the earth has been cooling. Global warming is reborn as climate change. That’s good, since this same movement was frightening people in the 70′s with “global cooling.” (That way they won’t have to keep switching back and forth from cooling to warming.)

We really need more brilliant minds like Bill Maher to be in charge of us stupid people and everything we do. Apparently these elite minds have realized that one fix for global warming would be if there were less people like us. Read more…

ST PAUL, Minnesota: The British are coming! The British are coming! The famous war cry of Paul Revere. Four words that stir the heart of every patriotic American. (Do they even teach this any more?) Over 200 years ago Paul Revere warned his neighbors about the coming dangers to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Now the British are coming again, only this time, they are warning us. On October 14th Lord Christopher Monckton came to America and spoke at the Minnesota Free Market Institute regarding the UN treaty on climate change to be signed by President Obama in Copenhagen in December 2009. In his address he raises the legitimate concern that Obama is preparing to sign away US sovereignty. Read more…

Senate Report on Global Warming

To start with, a warning: you will have to read original source material and think for yourself if want to analyze this topic. The links to the documents are here, but you will have to do some work.

Have you noticed they are now calling it “Man-Made Climate Change” rather than “Global Warming?” Turns out the globe is getting cooler. Guess what? The science isn’t “settled,” sorry Al.

I guess since Mr. Gore lost his Senate seat he hasn’t bothered keeping up with Senate research. You should read the US Senate’s own 2008 report: 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims. The report expands on the 2007 Senate Report which outlines objections made by 400 scientists.

You should also read the Science and Public Policy Institute’s report: Prejudiced Authors, Prejudiced Findings. Read these 2 reports and then you be the judge. You will realize the question is not who is misleading who, but the real question is why?