<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Institute of Prevarication &#187; Andrew Revkin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prevarication.net/tag/andrew-revkin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prevarication.net</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the exposure and preservation of prevarication in public life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:21:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Population Control Prevents Global Warming</title>
		<link>http://prevarication.net/2009/10/population-control-prevents-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://prevarication.net/2009/10/population-control-prevents-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl Munchausen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Revkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Maher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prevarication.net/?p=826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing interesting about the global warming debate is the direction in which its proponents want to push our governments. Never mind the science is bad. No matter the earth has been cooling. Global warming is reborn as climate change. That&#8217;s good, since this same movement was frightening people in the 70&#8242;s with &#8220;global cooling.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-837" title="Population Control Slows Global Warming" src="http://prevarication.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/nobabies.jpg" alt="Population Control Slows Global Warming" hspace="6" width="125" height="126" />One thing interesting about the global warming debate is the direction in which its proponents want to push our governments. Never mind the science is bad. No matter the earth has been cooling. Global warming is reborn as climate change. That&#8217;s good, since this same movement was frightening people in the 70&#8242;s with &#8220;global cooling.&#8221; (That way they won&#8217;t have to keep switching back and forth from cooling to warming.)</p>
<p>We really need more brilliant minds like Bill Maher to be in charge of us <a title="Bill Maher on stupid Americans" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-p7dlM9ACng" target="_blank">stupid people</a> and everything we do. Apparently these elite minds have realized that one fix for global warming would be if there were less people like <em>us</em>.<span id="more-826"></span></p>
<p>Elena Marszalek  of the The Worldwatch Institute reports on <a title="Elana Marszalek Worldwatch Institute Carbon Credits for Birth Control" href="http://blogs.worldwatch.org/datelinecopenhagen/carbon-credits-for-having-fewer-children/" target="_blank">October 16</a> that environmental thinkers are giving serious consideration to birth control as one of the most important tools to reduce mankind&#8217;s carbon footprint.</p>
<p>Andrew Revkin in his <a title="Andrew Revkin NY Times Carbon Credits for Babies" href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/the-ultimate-green-technology-condoms/" target="_blank">New York Times blog</a> September 15 opines that we shouldn&#8217;t be satisfied with cap and trade for industry but extend it to individuals:</p>
<blockquote><p>More children equal more carbon dioxide emissions. And recent research has resulted in  renewed coverage of the notion that one of the cheapest ways to curb emissions in coming decades would be to provide access to birth control for tens of millions of women around the world&#8230;</p>
<p>I recently raised the question of whether this means we’ll soon see a market in baby-avoidance carbon credits similar to efforts to sell  CO2 credits for avoiding deforestation. This is purely a thought experiment, not a proposal. But the issue is one that is rarely discussed in climate treaty talks or in debates over United States climate legislation. If anything, the population-climate question is more pressing in the United States than in developing countries, given the high per-capita carbon dioxide emissions here and the  rate of population growth. If giving women a way to limit family size is such a cheap win for emissions, why isn’t it in the mix?</p></blockquote>
<p>We suspect that Bill Maher is typical of the intelligentsia who long for a dictatorship like China&#8217;s. China has had severe population controls for years. Jane Macartney in Beijing <a title="China's Population Imbalance" href="http://trinaallen.wordpress.com/2007/01/13/china-faces-population-imbalance-crisis/" target="_blank">Times Online</a>, <a title="MSNBC China's demographic imbalance" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5953508" target="_blank">MSNBC</a>, the <a title="Huffington Post China's Population Imbalance" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/10/chinas-population-laws-th_n_185626.html" target="_blank">Huffington Post</a>, and others report an unintended consequence of their population control policy. In just a few years China faces a shortage of 30 million brides. One in ten marriageable men may have no chance to marry.</p>
<p>Presumably in such a scenario it would be even more important for &#8220;smart men&#8221; like Bill Maher to father as many children with as many women as possible to further his gene pool and insure a smarter posterity.</p>
<p>Oh wait&#8230; didn&#8217;t they try that already? Was it the Ming or the Maher-ing Dynasty?</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/x1gH8aUhcTA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/x1gH8aUhcTA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://prevarication.net/2009/10/population-control-prevents-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
